We can all benefit from such innovations; who wouldn’t want better bike locks or services like ‘Immobilise’ which allows people to register their valuables and have them returned if stolen? But critics object that many of these initiatives involve manipulating the public to change their behaviour whether they like it or not. When crime-busting features are automatically included in products, clothing and even in neighbourhood layouts, are the public not denied choice?
Designers can’t be blamed for working on lucrative government contracts, but is the ‘design establishment’ compromised by aligning itself with explicitly politicised agendas like ‘the war on crime’? Are designers pandering to panics about rising crime levels where in reality, crime is not escalating, despite the headlines? Is there a danger of turning communities into experimental playgrounds for designers? Or is designing out crime simply an opportunity to improve our lives for the better, and even – to quote the Design Council – ‘stop violence and save lives’?
Professor Lorraine Gamman professor, design studies, Central St Martins College of Art and Design, London; director, Design Against Crime Research Centre
Daniel Moylan deputy chairman, Transport for London; deputy leader, Kensington and Chelsea Council; chairman, Urban Design London
Martyn Perks director, Thinking Apart; co-author Big Potatoes: the London manifesto for innovation
Dr Stuart Waiton lecturer in sociology and criminology, University of Abertay, Dundee; director, Generation Youth Issues; author The Politics of Antisocial Behaviour: amoral panics; campaigner against anti-sectarian legislation
Dolan Cummings associate fellow, Institute of Ideas; editor, Culture Wars; editor, Debating Humanism; co-founder, Manifesto Club
Produced by Martyn Perks director, Thinking Apart; co-author Big Potatoes: the London manifesto for innovation